A different NDT method, different defects?
€4.90
In stock
article number
01252_2014_SP2_09
That could be said if it is established what defects can best be found with what NDT method. But it can also mean that when using a different test method, its specific indication accuracy and characteristics must be used to adapt the acceptance criteria for the quality of the weld. This article describes how switching from x-ray and manual ultrasonic testing to fully automated, zonally focused ultrasonic testing – combined with “Time of Flight Diffraction” (AUT) – affects the acceptance criteria that are to be used.
Authors | O. J. C. Huising |
---|---|
Publishing Date | 29 Aug 2014 |
Format | |
Zeitschrift | 3R - Special 2 2014 |
Publisher | Vulkan-Verlag GmbH |
Language | English |
Pages | 4 |
Title | A different NDT method, different defects? |
Description | That could be said if it is established what defects can best be found with what NDT method. But it can also mean that when using a different test method, its specific indication accuracy and characteristics must be used to adapt the acceptance criteria for the quality of the weld. This article describes how switching from x-ray and manual ultrasonic testing to fully automated, zonally focused ultrasonic testing – combined with “Time of Flight Diffraction” (AUT) – affects the acceptance criteria that are to be used. |
Write Your Own Review